Okay,
so a logical decision by the Norwegian Nobel Committee in deciding on the OPCW,
the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, an international
watchdog entrusted with the arduous task of freeing the world from the chemical
weapons.
Accorded
sanctity and authority by the Chemical Weapons Convention, an international
treaty that came into force in 1997, OPCW has been working to stop production
and use of chemical weapons and to destroy the existing stockpile.
Organizations
like OPCW or IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency, the nuclear watchdog and
the recipient of 2005 Peace Nobel) are the silent warriors working tirelessly
for global peace.
Though
a well-deserved accolade for the body of work the organization represents, OPCW
did not make for headlines as a major Peace Nobel contender. And so it was a
pleasant surprise for anyone who knows about the work of the organization and
its recent tough and dangerous mission in Syria. Their
convoy in Syria has come under attack during
inspection visit in September.
OPCW is
in news for its collaborative work with the United Nations in destroying the
chemical weapons stockpile of the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria.
The
world saw the horror of the use of chemical weapons in a Damascus suburb through the video footage
released by the Syrian opposition. The validity of the video clips was
authenticated by many intelligence agencies. The major ones held the Assad
regime responsible. A tough military action could only be avoided because of
the Russian ploy to save Assad. The dictator in Vladimir Putin went to the
extra mile to defend the dictator in Bashar al-Assad.
The
result is the compromise – Syria ratifying the Chemical Weapons Convention
and agreeing to destroy its chemical weapons stockpile by the international
experts from the OPCW and the UN.
Peace
Nobel to OPCW is the recognition of the work done over the years but the
decision is certainly influenced by the Syrian context.
It is
the call to be on the process to restore the sanctity of ‘Humanity First’.
It is
an endorsement to promote the policies of global peace. It is the appreciation
to the commitment to make the world a better place. It is a message to the
countries still sitting over their stockpiles.
It is
an encouragement to continue with the work, because the world is still facing
the threat of thousands of tons of existing chemical weapons that like the
nuclear weapons, can wipe out the humanity.
Though
with Syria,
the Chemical Weapons Convention now has 190 countries as its signatories, there
are countries yet to destroy their chemical weapons including Russia and the Unites States. Then there are belligerent
war-mongering nations like North Korea.
And no
one can say there would not be another Adolf Hitler tomorrow armed with some Holocaust
like ideology to threaten the mass extinction of civilizations.