The best way to know the self is feeling oneself at the moments of reckoning. The feeling of being alone, just with your senses, may lead you to think more consciously. More and more of such moments may sensitize ‘you towards you’, towards others. We become regular with introspection and retrospection. We get ‘the’ gradual connect to the higher self we may name Spirituality or God or just a Humane Conscious. We tend to get a rhythm again in life. We need to learn the art of being lonely in crowd while being part of the crowd. A multitude of loneliness in mosaic of relations! One needs to feel it severally, with conscience, before making it a way of life. One needs to live several such lonely moments. One needs to live severallyalone.

Monday, 18 March 2013


Why does a System exist?                                  

What does a System exist for?

Who all constitute a System?

What all should a System exist for?

Let’s see the universally accepted (and rightfully correct) answers sanctified by the human elements of the human civilization.

Human civilization here means the human society. Civilization might be a complex term with different and differential connotations and permutations associated with its various elements, but the basic driving force of the process of civilization can be defined in the simplest of the terms – striving to make a society that provides ideal living conditions to each of its inhabitants.

So, what are the answers that we come across:

Why does a System exist?

To bring an order among the various elements that, constitute the System. In case of the human civilization, the primary element of the System is the humans.

What does a system exist for?

Being human first and remain human always – a System exist for the people it is made up of.

Who all constitute a system?

The human beings who believe in the universal doctrine of the human civilization of ‘being and remain human’

What all should a System exist for?

To maintain human harmony, to promote ‘human’ growth and to weed out the ‘inhuman’ elements

The in-built and the inherent point of concern of the System thus should be the ‘human’ existence and:

–         his life;
–         his livelihood;
–         a responsible living with dignity treating every other life in the same way.

Any deviation from this norm is an accident and the System needs to be cautious, proactive and reactive to eliminate the accidents.

And a ‘human taking life of a human’ or ‘a man killing a man’ is the worst accident of all this.

But people in some of the establishments (that are very well part of the System) say not all the murders are accidents.

When the human civilization is about ‘being and remain human’, how can they say it?

How can they frame policies on this ill-thought and misplaced premise?

Isn't it anti to the basic tenet of any human society - striving to make a society that provides ideal living conditions to each of its inhabitants.

Isn't it ominous?

©/IPR: Santosh Chaubey -