CONTRADICTIONS IN THE JAIPUR SPEECH BY THE CONGRESS PARTY
VICE-PRESIDENT RAHUL GANDHI (III)
People who are corrupt stand up and talk about eradicating
corruption; and then people who disrespect women everyday of their lives talk
about women rights.
What about the Robert Vadra cover-up then?
When it was done by the people sitting at the top, don’t
you think the statement made by you regarding corruption squarely contradicts
its pretext, if there was any?
Corruption was always there but the country has seen it
touching mammoth scale since 2004 when the United Progressive Alliance
government took over. All the big scams like the 2G spectrum allocation, coal-block
allocation or Commonwealth Games scams or many others have seen genesis during
the term of your party rule.
Instead of treating them as the warning signs and
embarking on a course-correction mode, your party’s government chose to go in
denial, delay probes or castigate Constitutional agencies like the Comptroller
and Auditor General (CAG), the reports of which unearthed many scams.
What do you have to say on the corruption ombudsman, the
Lokpal?
Given the fact that the Congress party has been in power
most of the time in the Independent India, the formation of the Lokpal should
never have lingered on for over four decades. And your party’s government,
along with other political parties, has successfully derailed it even this
time. Given the goings and thanks to a corrupt and alienated political class,
the Lokpal is not going to be a reality anytime soon in the near future. And
then there would be compulsions and clamour of the next general election
burying the issue for some more time.
Do you remember your parliament speech where you spoke of
making Lokpal a Constitutional body? Whatever little that the political class
has agreed to empower the proposed Lokpal with is nothing but a lip-service to
mislead the people.
Can corruption, that has become a chronic malaise of the
Indian society, be eradicated with such a lip-serving attitude Mr. Gandhi?
You also spoke about women rights.
It’s basically about sensitivity that is not there in your
government and the larger political class. You too, fall short on it. The
recent context of the Delhi
gangrape protests is a self-explanatory evidence.
The major reason behind death of the Delhi gangrape victim was your government’s
apathy that reflected in continuing with an ill-equipped hospital and delay in
the treatment when every hour of the victim’s life was important.
Also, why it took you so many days (your first reaction
came on December 23, 2012, a week after the crime) to break your silence?
The youth of the country that you so emphatically spoke
about in your first speech as the Congress party Vice-President, was there on
the streets, raging silently, questioning the authorities’ inaction and
demanding quick answers and reforms of permanent nature. Why were you so
reserved in communicating with them then?
Today, your very own government snubbed the report
submitted by the Justice J S Verma Committee that slams the government, the police
and the public for crime against women. Why your government had to do so when
its spokespersons had assured the country that the committee was constituted to
address the concerns and demands of the masses on crime against women?
The committee, then seen as a face saving exercise in the
aftermath of the huge protests, slaps back in the face of your government with
its report that came out today.
But what is shockingly insensitive is the attitude shown
by your government in accepting the liability.
Your party’s government is not ready to accept the report now when it has
put the government in the dock.
Shouldn’t we assume that forming the Verma Committee was
mere an eyewash attempt then?
Also, do you remember what you had said on the Delhi gangrape when your
silence became the talk of the town? I quote here from a December 23, 2012 report
of the Economic Times*: “Sources said during the meeting Rahul told the
group of youths that while he understands and respect their emotions and
acknowledged that the issue is very emotive, he also stressed that
"decision making should happen in a rational manner. Decisions taken cannot
be driven merely by emotions.”
Mr. Gandhi, like you tried to deliver an emotional speech,
policymaking for humans too, should have emotional connect.
Why can’t
decisions be driven merely by emotions? , when the issue has become of
emotional breakdown in the society; when the ghastly incidents are breaking
every heinous limit; when the criminals are easily finding the ways to skirt
the law; when the criminals are becoming more and more audacious feeding on the
parasitic fear of the victims; and when the rule-book and the defined procedure
is failing to control the rot.
©/IPR: Santosh Chaubey - http://severallyalone.blogspot.com/