At some point of time in the
recent past of my life, it was just in passing during a fine day of the Jaipur
Literature Festival (JLF)*. I was sitting in the media lobby though I was there
purely on a personal visit. I had thought to observe things in the silence that
an active profile would not have permitted.
Though I had no personal
favourites there scheduled to hold the session that day, it was good to sit in
the lobby and have small chit-chats with the authors coming over there for
small breaks.
The lobby was almost in front of
the main pavilion of the JLF at the Diggi Palace hotel, so it gave a good view
of the sessions going on in there as well. An added advantage!
That session in progress during
the day was sounding something off the guard and so I was in my thoughts driven
away from the fake hullabaloo of the surrounding crowd.
Due to the certain proximate
events in life, my thoughts were centered on value propositions in life.
Circumstances had played with me strangely (and
negatively) but I had successfully tried to remain straight forward and the
similar thoughts prevail to this day.
Suddenly, a voice pulled my
attention. Some gentlemen were talking on ‘Difficulty
of Being Good’ by Gurcharan Das
and the author was among them. The book is a different perspective on Mahabharata, one of the two principal sacred
books of Hinduism (the other one is
Ramayana) pondering over the questions of existence in the backdrop of
events culminating in a great war, in
context of the human psyche of prevailing on good values away from the clutches
of immoral overtures. I had read the book only some days ago.
I was pounding on good and bad
aspects in my life and reflection of my thoughts over them when I overheard
them discussing good and bad in life in general.
Though, not even in the remote
possible way the book had affected my thoughts, I was naturally attracted to
the discussion given the subject matter. I could not correlate to the book but
there were some nagging questions. I thought to pose them to Mr. Das when I
could get him sitting alone.
To my moments of comfort, soon I
had the moment. For all his work related to the ‘Dharma’ (the moral guide) of different aspects in life, it was
natural for me to talk to him on some more dose of Dharma, to see if it really works.
My questions were on the
desperation or urge to be good or to say like not extending even the slightest
of the harm to anyone (If you see being
good is like acting godly these days and so think it makes you look sham,
always a silly thought!). The good thing for me was the deliberations were
on my line of thoughts. But the not so good thing was I found too little scope
in going further.
Being good is not about having some profound wisdom about do’s and
don’ts of ethics in life. It is about living the truth of the smaller moments
to sooth your conscience first and then to emulate them on the larger canvas.
It is about living YOU.
Such questions are qualitative in
nature and I know they do not have direct answers or probably no answers (the millions of answers for the millions of
souls).
Accept the universally accepted
definition of good in life (the value
proposition) and live them in your context. Do this and you are there.
The discussion didn’t last long
and how could it be in the frenzy of glamour and managed publicity. Though I
wanted to include the Ramayana in the
context of the ‘difficulty of being good’, when Mr. Das said he was not much
aware of the Ramayana, even I had no
point to sit further.